Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New RESTRICT=live value for identification of live ebuilds?
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 23:06:40
Message-Id: 4894E890.8020401@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New RESTRICT=live value for identification of live ebuilds? by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
5 > 2008-08-02 04:02:48 Zac Medico napisał(a):
6 > The names of other RESTRICT values are related to features which are
7 > restricted. The new proposed value is intended for live ebuilds so its
8 > name should be negation of this feature. I think that something like
9 > RESTRICT=constant-sources would be better.
10
11 Like I've said before, that particular convention is pretty
12 worthless in my eyes. I'd much prefer RESTRICT=live-sources if we
13 want to use a longer name.
14
15 Zac
16 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
17 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
18
19 iEYEARECAAYFAkiU6I8ACgkQ/ejvha5XGaOGLgCfcSDPfcoxmOdgZZlG4j1ag10O
20 LxoAoKlrcrCVMYPaGQCTKF0Qf5GcljBP
21 =9nNG
22 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies