Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
Subject: Re: prune_libtool_files is NOT a direct replacement for, example, find "${D}" -name '*.la' -delete
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:18:56 +0200
El jue, 28-06-2012 a las 10:26 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:12:34 +0300
> Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote:
> 
> > The logic in prune_libtool_files is not perfect[1].
> 
> Define 'perfect'.
> 
> > To clarify:
> > 
> > Use `prune_libtool_files --all` instead of plain
> > `prune_libtool_files` if you don't test the package with the USE
> > flags.
> 
> Sounds like abuse of '--all' to me. It's like calling 'rm -r' for
> single file...
> 
> > [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/421197
> 

But we will need to use "--all" in cases like pointed in that bug
report, no? :/
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
References:
prune_libtool_files is NOT a direct replacement for, example, find "${D}" -name '*.la' -delete
-- Samuli Suominen
Re: prune_libtool_files is NOT a direct replacement for, example, find "${D}" -name '*.la' -delete
-- Michał Górny
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: prune_libtool_files is NOT a direct replacement for, example, find "${D}" -name '*.la' -delete
Next by thread:
Feature Request/RFC : "Elective" virtuals
Previous by date:
Re: euscan GSoC project - requesting feedback
Next by date:
Re: bug XXXXXX sys-libs/tdb fail check for building library support


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.