| 1 |
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 19:03 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are |
| 6 |
> > preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near |
| 7 |
> > stabilization)? |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > I have read hardmask message but it simply explains that it's masked for |
| 10 |
> > testing purposes :-/ |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Grub is the only blocker. I don't want to unmask something that makes |
| 13 |
> people's systems unbootable. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I'm also out of ideas and open to suggestions. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
gcc is slotted. Is there any reason why we can't simply make grub depend |
| 18 |
on a working slot of gcc and set CC appropriately in the ebuild? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-Alexandre |
Archives