Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Rigo <rigo@××××.nl>
To: Ryan Phillips <rphillips@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Povray 3.5 Testing
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 17:20:42
Message-Id: 1028584497.12322.9.camel@lappy.rogi.biz
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Povray 3.5 Testing by Ryan Phillips
1 * Installing configuration files
2 * *Warning* I/O Security disabled by default
3 * Check /etc/povray.conf to enable
4 >>> Regenerating /etc/ld.so.cache...
5 >>> media-gfx/povray-3.50a merged.
6
7 ;) !
8
9
10 Op ma 05-08-2002, om 19:17 schreef Ryan Phillips:
11 > * Rigo <rigo@××××.nl> [2002-08-05 08:22]:
12 > > Same here... ( See Bug No. 5956)
13 > >
14 > > Rigo
15 > >
16 > > Op ma 05-08-2002, om 08:12 schreef Jonathan Kelly:
17 > > > On Sun, 4 Aug 2002 20:21:06 -0700
18 > > > Ryan Phillips <rphillips@g.o> wrote:
19 > > >
20 > > > > I have included a masked version of the new povray 3.5 ebuild into the
21 > > > > portage tree. Povray's package has changed to an autoconf system, and
22 > > > > the source needs to be patched for gcc 3.1 to get it to compile
23 > > > > correctly (atleast on my machine).
24 > > > >
25 > > > > Currently, ICC support may be broken (please tell me if it is, I haven't
26 > > > > tested it), and PPC needs to be tested. If anyone finds any bugs,
27 > > > > please open a bug report and direct it to my attention.
28 > > > >
29 > > > > As a sidenote, there is a new I/O security implementation included into
30 > > > > this version of povray. I have disabled it by default
31 > > > > (/etc/povray.conf). Is this wise?
32 > > >
33 > > > I think there is something weird going on here related to the fact that
34 > > > the 3.5 tarball has the same name is the 3.1g tarball .... it downloads
35 > > > povuni_s.tgz from ibiblio and then starts a restart operation from
36 > > > ftp.povray.org
37 > > >
38 >
39 > Ibiblio wasn't synced correctly... The file should be around 6 MB and
40 > should be ok to download from ibilio now.
41 >
42 > -ryan