1 |
On Sun, 7 Aug 2011 11:12:47 +0200 |
2 |
Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> > Problems: |
5 |
> > - atomic/well-ordered commits that span packages, eclasses and |
6 |
> > profiles/ directories. (Esp. committing to eclasses and then |
7 |
> > packages afterwards). |
8 |
> |
9 |
> This can be done with a single commit to the rsync tree script, and it |
10 |
> doesn't necessarily need git repos. |
11 |
|
12 |
And have you considered the function PoV on this? |
13 |
|
14 |
With clean git repo: few commits, git push |
15 |
|
16 |
With your split-tree: a lot of commits to random packages, potentially |
17 |
using random VCS-es, a lot of pushes, hacking some magical rsync stuff |
18 |
and finally guessing what went wrong this time |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Best regards, |
22 |
Michał Górny |