Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Subject: Re: [RFC] client/server policy for ebuilds
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:56:19 -0400
On Saturday 10 June 2006 10:29, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 18:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 09 June 2006 16:35, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > This is the "official" (hehe) request for comments on making a policy
> > > of how to handle ebuilds than can be used for either client or server
> > > and how to allow for building client-only.
> >
> > rather than moving to some sort of policy that satisfies no one
> > completely and we'll have to back out of later, why dont we wait until
> > portage can give us proper support for USE=client/server
>
> Got an ETA?
>
> The situation we have now is confusing, at best, to our users, and
> something really should be done to resolve it.

sure, dont add support for the flags at all at this point, problem solved

USE=minimal has no real definition, no point in trying to iron one out imo
-mike
Attachment:
pgpF65b58aiB3.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: [RFC] client/server policy for ebuilds
-- Chris Gianelloni
References:
[RFC] client/server policy for ebuilds
-- Chris Gianelloni
Re: [RFC] client/server policy for ebuilds
-- Mike Frysinger
Re: [RFC] client/server policy for ebuilds
-- Chris Gianelloni
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: [RFC] client/server policy for ebuilds
Next by thread:
Re: [RFC] client/server policy for ebuilds
Previous by date:
Re: [RFC] i18n project
Next by date:
Re: Project Sunrise -- Proposal


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.