| 1 |
>> So again, there's no point in masking a package "unstable" just because its dependencies are "unstable". |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Er? If the dependencies are marked unstable and the package isn't, nobody |
| 4 |
> (or nobody only using stable keywords, I should say) can install it unless |
| 5 |
> the dependencies are marked stable... |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Exactly, that's what is intended. So you simply don't gain anything with marking the package itself "unstable" as well, except for more |
| 8 |
work. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
-- |
| 11 |
Maik Schreiber, Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 12 |
http://www.gentoo.org |
| 13 |
mailto:blizzy@g.o |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives