Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 10:17:05 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ryan Hill wrote:
> Though I'm still not sure what happens when a package is in two
> unrelated sets..
> 
> @gnome:
>    RDEPEND=">=gnome-extra/gnome-screensaver-2.22.2"
> 
> @xfce4:
>    RDEPEND="gnome-extra/gnome-screensaver"
> 
> package.use:
> @gnome             opengl
> @xfce              -opengl
> 

I suppose we could use the order that they are listed in package.use
to apply the incremental stacking, so opengl would be disabled since
@xfce comes after @gnome.
- --
Thanks,
Zac
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkjnpRAACgkQ/ejvha5XGaMhCACfcCqqfRl6sLXbXsc9k/8yMg90
JqkAoLWCVoH2Jf+6RRAd0CnlLsl82SSO
=alvy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Replies:
Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets
-- Ryan Hill
References:
[RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets
-- Zac Medico
Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets
-- Zac Medico
Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets
-- Bo Ørsted Andresen
Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets
-- Zac Medico
Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets
-- Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets
-- Zac Medico
Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets
-- Ryan Hill
Re: Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets
-- Zac Medico
Re: Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets
-- Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets
-- Ryan Hill
Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets
-- Ryan Hill
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets
Next by thread:
Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets
Previous by date:
Re: Re: Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask
Next by date:
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Label profiles with EAPI for compatibility checks


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.