On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:13:11 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...> wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:23:07 +0200
> Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o> wrote:
> > So qutecom is not broken and needs not be removed as long as
> > <linux-headers-2.6.38 is in the tree.
> 
> Dependencies using <, <=, =, ~ or =* are broken, except in certain
> special situations inside ||.

So, in your opinion, if we have 'foo' and 'libfoo' which are strictly
version-bound, we can't allow users to install older versions?

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny