| 1 |
On 9/28/06, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Tach David, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > David Grant schrieb: |
| 7 |
> >> On 9/28/06, Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> >>> +++ Mark Stier [28/09/06 15:35 +0200]: |
| 9 |
> >>>> How about entering the removed ebuilds into bugzilla under an |
| 10 |
> adequate |
| 11 |
> >>>> section? |
| 12 |
> >>> I think my original reply got lost, so just in case - seems like a |
| 13 |
> time |
| 14 |
> >>> for sunset overlays ;0 |
| 15 |
> >> or sunrise rather... |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > New packages not yet in the tree -> sunrise |
| 18 |
> > Old crufty packages removed from the tree -> sunset |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > Got it? |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > V-Li |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> There is a TreeCleaner Project overlay; but I was planning on placing |
| 26 |
> tools in it; I may be convinced to add the ebuilds (and their files) |
| 27 |
> that we clean to it; assuming it doesn't take anyone that long to do it; |
| 28 |
> the problem being for some things that live only on our mirrors; the |
| 29 |
> ebuilds won't work as the files get purged after two weeks. Let me |
| 30 |
> consider this though; if we can script it somehow it would maybe benefit |
| 31 |
> others (a treecleaner poopy overlay for Layman also...) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
That would be an awesome idea. I have never been a fan of cleaned ebuilds |
| 36 |
moving to the CVS attic and I have had to fetch some old ebuild and |
| 37 |
associated patches from the portage's CVS Attic on 2 occasions and it was a |
| 38 |
major pain. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
David Grant |
| 43 |
http://www.davidgrant.ca |
Archives