Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: Building custom package for multi-arch/system
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:24:21 -0800
On 01/30/2010 10:11 AM, Duncan wrote:
> Thanks.  I knew the PORTAGE_BINHOST and --config-root bits, but hadn't 
> thought about the tree not being needed, save for the profiles.  I 
> recently setup a netbook based on a Gentoo image compiled elsewhere, and 
> while it's now functional, I'm still tweaking stuff, including the portage 
> arrangement.   That I don't need the entire gentoo tree for emerging 
> binpkgs is thus quite interesting new information at this point. =:^)
> 
> Does that happen to be documented anywhere?  I'd not seen it before.

No, not really. The binhost support was updated in portage-2.1.6,
with support for the $PKGDIR/Packages file. Since then it's a lot
more appealing.
-- 
Thanks,
Zac


References:
Building custom package for multi-arch/system
-- Beber
Re: Building custom package for multi-arch/system
-- Max Arnold
Re: Building custom package for multi-arch/system
-- Zac Medico
Re: Building custom package for multi-arch/system
-- Duncan
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Building custom package for multi-arch/system
Next by thread:
up-to-date presentations on Gentoo?
Previous by date:
Re: Building custom package for multi-arch/system
Next by date:
Tree-signing GLEPs update


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.