Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
To: Jani Monoses <jani@...>
From: Klavs Klavsen <kl@...>
Subject: Re: sylpheed update
Date: 25 Apr 2003 16:24:42 +0200
On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 11:06, Jani Monoses wrote:
> Hi
> I have s 0.8.8 installed and an update would go back to 0.8.5-r1
> because 0.8.11 is masked and other ebuilds have been deleted so the
> greatest stable is 0.8.5
> while this is probably an accident it would be good if portage would not
> allow such inconsistencies to happen.
you mean not downgrading? then just use -Uu instead of just -u - then it
won't try to downgrade.
Klavs Klavsen, GSEC - kl@... -

Working with Unix is like wrestling a worthy opponent. 
Working with windows is like attacking a small whining child 
who is carrying a .38.				
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
sylpheed update
-- Jani Monoses
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
sylpheed update
Next by thread:
Re: sylpheed update
Previous by date:
Next by date:
Re: Several portage trees

Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.