Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
To: Miles Egan <miles@×××××.com>
Cc: Spider <spider@g.o>, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary release of gentoo
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:57:14
Message-Id: 20030410185711.GA29951@cerberus.oppresses.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary release of gentoo by Miles Egan
1 On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 01:16:32AM -0700, Miles Egan wrote:
2 > Spider wrote:
3 >
4 > >I know I'd welcome it, as a far simpler way of installing and keeping my
5 > >celeron running.. But I think it'd require some more portage hacking
6 > >to "make it work", at least the following.
7 >
8 > I help manage a linux compute cluster of about 1500 nodes. We run
9 > Redhat. Gentoo isn't even an option without something like kickstart
10 > and binary package support as good as rpm's.
11 >
12 > miles
13 >
14 >
15 >
16 > --
17 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
18
19 Put buildpkg in FEATURES and you'll have binary packages just as good as
20 RPMs built automatically every time you merge something.
21
22 --
23 Jon Portnoy
24 avenj/irc.freenode.net
25
26 --
27 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary release of gentoo Spider <spider@g.o>