1 |
On 01/24/2010 08:20 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: |
2 |
> 2010/1/24 Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o>: |
3 |
>> On 01/24/2010 03:02 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: |
4 |
>>> You can't have functioning package management without the hard |
5 |
>>> dependencies it requires. So both portage and python should be in the |
6 |
>>> system set. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> Why should we keep redundant information in the list? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> How is that redundant? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Cheers, |
13 |
|
14 |
The problem the original poster wanted to solve is having a warning when |
15 |
trying to unmerge something in "system". The best way here is to file a |
16 |
Portage enhancement request and not pollute the profile system set |
17 |
marking. The purpose of the packages file is to describe what needs to |
18 |
be installed for a minimal system to work so it doesn't make sense to |
19 |
pollute it with implementation details. |
20 |
|
21 |
Regards, |
22 |
Petteri |