Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Candidates for global USE flags
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 02:48:25
Message-Id: 20111001205702.0962cbe0@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Candidates for global USE flags by Samuli Suominen
1 On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:19:26 +0300
2 Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > > 17 tools
5 > > 9 utils
6 >
7 > tools, and utils, what's the difference? perhaps pick one and unify them
8 > into global USE flag
9
10 Saying what? "Install optional tools or utilities." That's pretty useless as
11 far as descriptions go.
12
13 I'd rather they were local flags describing exactly what gets installed.
14
15
16 --
17 fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense
18 toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime
19 @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Candidates for global USE flags James Broadhead <jamesbroadhead@×××××.com>