| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Doty wrote: |
| 3 |
>> It is devrels place to attempt to stop the fighting. This is what I |
| 4 |
>> did. I clearly indicate that this is temporary and when the council is |
| 5 |
>> willing to clear this nonsense up, it will supersede anything I put |
| 6 |
>> forth yesterday. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I agree that it is devrel's place to help people find a compromise. I |
| 9 |
> disagree that it is devrel's place to set general technical policy based |
| 10 |
> on this compromise by saying "All non-Gentoo hosted overlays are subject |
| 11 |
> to this" when the compromise does not involve all the relevant people. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Thanks, |
| 14 |
> Donnie |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
What you're missing here is that I did not make a technical decision. I |
| 17 |
implemented the councils recommendations in such a manner as to not piss |
| 18 |
off either side too much. If you're familiar with US leagalize, you |
| 19 |
should view this as a temporary injunction. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I implore you and other interested developers to address the remaining |
| 22 |
points through constructive discussion and then ask the council to make |
| 23 |
a final decision. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Here are a list of points that I feel need more discussion: |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
1. Different types of overlays: gentoo.org vs. non-gentoo.org and |
| 28 |
developer focused vs. user focused. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
2. Appropriate use of bugzilla for overlays of all varieties. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
3. Appropriate use of www.gentoo.org/proj for overlays. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
======================================================= |
| 37 |
Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org |
| 38 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead |
| 39 |
Gentoo Developer Relations |
| 40 |
Gentoo Recruitment Lead |
| 41 |
Gentoo Infrastructure |
| 42 |
GPG: 0094 7F06 913E 78D6 F1BB 06BA D0AD D125 A797 C7A7 |
| 43 |
======================================================= |
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives