1 |
begin quote |
2 |
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:41:13 -0400 |
3 |
Cedric Veilleux <cedric@×××××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
> > 3) And, finally, just for completeness, and not because I think it's |
6 |
> > a good idea: allow anyone to subscribe, but not post, to the closed |
7 |
> > developer list. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I think it is the easiest and best solution.. what the heck is going |
11 |
> on in this darn -core list that must be kept secret? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I do understand the imPortance of allowing only developers post to it, |
14 |
> but really, I don't see what's the point of keeping it secret. |
15 |
> |
16 |
Because it lets me yell, rant ramble and make a fool out of myself and |
17 |
others in a fairly close community of people where such arguments and |
18 |
ideas are kept "inside" and you dont have to explain a lot of it to the |
19 |
sk. end users who wish to pry their noses into internal politics and |
20 |
developmentrelations? |
21 |
|
22 |
Oh you might think you should know why all devs are "unavaiable" at some |
23 |
point, who yells at who and who slept with who's sisters husband, But |
24 |
frankly, a lot of theese things are nicer to keep internally to avoid |
25 |
misunderstandings ands yellings that somone is a microsoftbribed |
26 |
luddite, that another is a rabid fsf-supporter and so on. |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
Development issues should be taken here, in public where people can get |
30 |
along and discuss it or just shut up and watch it, but internal politics |
31 |
and management, who's who's boss and who's boss did what and so on feels |
32 |
rather better to have on -core.. If not, it will just fall out to a few |
33 |
big address book aliases and be kept in private and start to fester |
34 |
badly. |
35 |
|
36 |
//Spider |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
begin .signature |
41 |
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
42 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
43 |
end |