| 1 |
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:09 am, Dan Armak wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Every subpackage would have a version/revision number of its own. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Sounds like a reasonable plan. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Now I must warn you these are all rough sketches and ideas off the top |
| 10 |
> of my head, and I don't guarantee they'll actually be executed! After |
| 11 |
> the freeze is over I'll discuss all this with the other Gentoo |
| 12 |
> developersn and a decision will be made (by people with more say in |
| 13 |
> Portage features than me, probably). But I'll try and convince people to |
| 14 |
> do this (and possibly try to implement the portage features myself, I |
| 15 |
> always wanted to do that...) |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
That would be excellent. I'd be willing to jump in, or at the very least |
| 19 |
test it out. Thanks again. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Cheers, |
| 22 |
Dylan Carlson [absinthe@×××××.com] |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives