Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
2010/1/17 Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>:
> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...>:
> As much as you love to have the new and shiny VDB2, it is far off.
> Prototyping and drafting implementations would be great to have some
> base where we can discuss on (in a civil manner). So having this
> timestamp would be a good way to prepare a sane migration path.
No, it wouldn't. Brian's proposal a) would be of no use whatsoever for
VDB2 migration, and b) would not be used by VDB2. Having a *decent*
cache validation mechanism is a good idea; having a half-baked one is
a waste of time.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
|
|
