| 1 |
Dne středa 12 Srpen 2009 19:58:05 Jeremy Olexa napsal(a): |
| 2 |
> I am suggesting that the new 10.0 profiles be marked as EAPI-2 |
| 3 |
> compliant. This involves setting the content of the 'eapi' file to "2" |
| 4 |
> and bumping up the required portage version. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> This seems like progress to me. Often, developers are complaining that |
| 7 |
> they can't use SLOT syntax in profiles (I know that is EAPI-1). Since, |
| 8 |
> the only time we can bump EAPI syntax in profiles is upon a new |
| 9 |
> directory creation, this seems like a good time to me. The new |
| 10 |
> profiles are still in flux until the official stages/cd's are |
| 11 |
> produced. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Also, another good reason is: "why not?" I don't think any Gentoo user |
| 14 |
> can avoid EAPI-2 up til now anyway. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Any comments? No comments means it will be decided off-list. |
| 17 |
> Timeframe: 1 week from now. |
| 18 |
> -Jeremy |
| 19 |
Agreed. This is great idea. |
| 20 |
Also we should allow the stuff as directory thingus (portage already handles |
| 21 |
it right). |
| 22 |
package.mask/koffice-2 |
| 23 |
package.mask/live-gnome |
| 24 |
.... |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Tomas |
Archives