Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:19:45
Message-Id: 4FD4E4FA.2090902@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On 06/10/2012 05:25 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:55:53 -0700
3 > Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
4 >> A dependency atom will have optional SLOT and ABI_SLOT parts. Using
5 >> the dbus-glib depedency on glib:2 as an example [1], the dbus-glib
6 >> dependency will be expressed with an atom such as dev-libs/glib:2:=
7 >> and the package manager will translate that atom to
8 >> dev-libs/glib:2:=2.32 at build time. So, ':' is always used to
9 >> distinguish SLOT deps, and ':=' is always used to distinguish
10 >> ABI_SLOT deps. Is that syntax good?
11 >
12 > Here's a nicer syntax: no ABI_SLOT variable, and SLOT="2/2.32". Then you
13 > can do explicit :2/2.32 dependencies if you like, or :2 (which would
14 > match SLOT="2" or SLOT="2/anything"), or :2= (which gets rewritten
15 > to :2/2.32=) or :2*. If an ebuild does SLOT="2", it's treated as 2/2.
16
17 Yes, I prefer your syntax.
18 --
19 Thanks,
20 Zac

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>