| 1 |
On 2012-03-12 Mon 10:54, Nathan Phillip Brink wrote: |
| 2 |
> > > # Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> (12 Mar 2012) |
| 3 |
> > > # Severely broken wrt bugs #179178, #331181, #334835, #350059, |
| 4 |
> > > # #372839, #380155, #380627, #381055, #383515, #383553, #384687, |
| 5 |
> > > # and #403399. Search bugzilla with keyword lilypond. Nothing |
| 6 |
> > > # left in tree that builds. Removal in 30 days. |
| 7 |
> > > <media-sound/lilypond-2.12.4 |
| 8 |
> > > media-sound/denemo |
| 9 |
> > > media-sound/frescobaldi |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > # Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> (12 Mar 2012) |
| 12 |
> > > # media-sound/lilypond required for this is masked in ../package.mask |
| 13 |
> > > # for removal |
| 14 |
> > > app-text/asciidoc test |
| 15 |
> > > |
| 16 |
> > Just curious, but is there no one interested in this, lilypond, |
| 17 |
> > package anymore? The latest stable is 2.14.2 and the project is pretty |
| 18 |
> > active. Seems like a shame to get rid of it entirely. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> I myself am quite interested in lilypond. I only use it occasionally |
| 21 |
> and am still a novice at it, but I like the typesetting it does. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> Maybe next week I can find time to attack some of these bugs and |
| 24 |
> rescue it, unless if someone more qualified or with more time is |
| 25 |
> interested... |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
For those not following #gentoo-dev, I already said I'd take over |
| 28 |
maintainership since I've been using it an overlay for years. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Anyone is free to help close bugs and co-maintain it if they wish. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Tim |
Archives