Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o> posted
20080606013721.06a5c36f@..., excerpted below, on  Fri, 06
Jun 2008 01:37:21 +0000:

>> 2. As one of the first priorities will be setting policy for pending
>> appeals what policy do you propose ?

> I'd also add two new requirements:
> 1.  Any appeal must be heard and decided within xxx days;

Not to seem disrespectful, but "Or what?"

Seriously, "or the appeal automatically succeeds."?  Or, "or the appeal 
automatically fails."?  Does it matter what the appeal is (the scope of 
the question wasn't limited to the current situation, so the answer must 
apply in broad scope as well)?

I'd urge being careful here, because it a similar failure to spell out 
the details that triggered what amounted to a bit of a constitutional 
crisis, tho the worst now seems past, I believe with the correct decision 
being made.  (My thanks to all involved.)

So the "or what" matters, as does the scope, which is why I'm asking 
about it.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list