Archives
Archives
| From: | Graham Murray <graham@×××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Thoughts about broken package handling | ||
| Date: | Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:45:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | 874o3busu7.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Thoughts about broken package handling by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> writes: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > The fix for that is to slot things properly. You're screwed anyway if a |
| 4 | > preserved library tries to access installed data that has either been |
| 5 | > removed or upgraded to a new format that it doesn't recognise. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Or some "awkward" packages which when rebuilt will still link against |
| 8 | the preserved library, but if the preserved library is deleted and the |
| 9 | package manually rebuild will link against the new one. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Thoughts about broken package handling | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |