Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 4 features not yet in PMS (was: Patch for python.eclass)

[Ulrich Mueller]

>>>>> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

> EAPI 4's current state used to be "closed, and approved subject to
> Portage implementation", but due to the huge delays in that there have
> been a number of things since then that the Council has voted on that
> no-one has provided PMS patches or even approximate wording for.

What EAPI 4 features are missing in PMS? I'm only aware of
REQUIRED_USE: <http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/required-use.html>

Is there anything else that is missing?

Ulrich