Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jacob Godserv <jacobgodserv@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:05:25
Message-Id: 2e0007041003102104y67c74e4aud6bef3eff1a4b976@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item by William Hubbs
1 The problem here, I think, is everyone has their opinion about what it
2 means for something to go stable, and I haven't seen more than one or
3 two references to what has been predetermined as policy for
4 stabilization. I think we should do a little less debating over
5 personal opinions (which is a "hot" topic, apparently) and more about
6 how Gentoo guidelines determine what can go stable. If the guidelines
7 don't cover this, then they ought to be fixed.
8
9 --
10 Jacob
11
12 "For then there will be great distress, unequaled
13 from the beginning of the world until now — and never
14 to be equaled again. If those days had not been cut
15 short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the
16 elect those days will be shortened."
17
18 Are you ready?

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>