1 |
Le mardi 09 mars 2010 à 22:32 -0600, Nathan Zachary a écrit : |
2 |
> On 09/03/10 22:08, Sebastian Pipping wrote: |
3 |
> > Hello! |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > We have about 500 bump request open at the moment: |
7 |
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > I assume that quite a few of them would be no big deal to their |
10 |
> > maintainers in Gentoo. |
11 |
|
12 |
For gnome assigned bumps, I can tell all of them have a reason/policy |
13 |
that explains why they are not done yet and I definitively don't want |
14 |
non-maintainer bumps for them. |
15 |
|
16 |
> Not sure that my opinion matters all that much as I'm not currently |
17 |
> doing ebuild work, but I think this idea could really help out the |
18 |
> status of the tree. Attached to it could be a stabilisation day as |
19 |
> well. |
20 |
|
21 |
That I would buy. I often hear users complaining that stable isn't that |
22 |
stable and they try to mix ~arch or completely move to ~arch instead of |
23 |
asking for stablereq. Here too gnome has a policy for some packages but |
24 |
a couple of them can be stabilized independently. Either way the |
25 |
reaction is generally quick. |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
29 |
Gentoo |