Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 10 April 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>   
>> gcc-4.3 seems to be standing up well.  since the major gcc-ebuild-specific
>> issues seem to be resolved now, i'll probably do a sweep of bugs to see if
>> there's any patches i'm missing (if you guys know of a bug that should be
>> addressed specifically in the gcc-4.3.0 ebuild, speak up now).
>>
>> then move on to the gcc 4.3 tracker bug (#198121).  once this gets below a
>> certain critical mass (i wont know what the critical mass is until it's
>> been de-attained), then we'll be ~arching things.  people are recommended
>> to do a quick sweep of the lower hangers (many bugs have simple patches).
>>
>> i'll drop in ~ppc ~amd64 ~x86 as i use those every day.  if any other arch
>> is happy now with things, add your ~arch to the commented out list in cvs
>> so i know to include it.
>>     
>
> the x86 cld revert is in now as well as some more upstream pr fixes.  i'll 
> probably let things settle for this week and pending any craziness, move 
> gcc-4.3.0-r1 into ~arch in a week.  i'll prob commit some "obvious" gcc-4.3 
> bugs at the same time.
>
> last chance to speak up peeps.
> -mike
>   
Poke. Gimme some gcc 4.3 goodness (besides the fact that I'm using it). 
But let's slap ~arch with it.
-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list