El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 13:43 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:26:16 +0200
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote:
> > OK, would you let me to create a tracker bug for eapi5 accepted item?
> 
> No. We're working on the PMS list. We don't need yet another place to
> look.
> 
> > About suggesting new item (like forcing rebuilding of other packages
> > as discussed some days ago and crosscompile support suggested by Tommy
> > today), I guess we need to get them voted by the council?
> 
> No. You need to get a draft diff for PMS written, along with an
> implementation in a package mangler of your choice and proof that it
> works in practice.
> 

Umm, this way to work makes any suggestion for future eapis to be
accepted only if they come from people able to prepare that
implementation in the package manager their prefer and, then, be stalled
more and more time :|

> The plan is we'll present the EAPI 5 branch to the Council and have
> them vote on each individual feature. Then we'll cherry-pick the ones
> they approve to master.
>