1 |
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 13:43 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: |
2 |
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:26:16 +0200 |
3 |
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > OK, would you let me to create a tracker bug for eapi5 accepted item? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> No. We're working on the PMS list. We don't need yet another place to |
7 |
> look. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> > About suggesting new item (like forcing rebuilding of other packages |
10 |
> > as discussed some days ago and crosscompile support suggested by Tommy |
11 |
> > today), I guess we need to get them voted by the council? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> No. You need to get a draft diff for PMS written, along with an |
14 |
> implementation in a package mangler of your choice and proof that it |
15 |
> works in practice. |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
Umm, this way to work makes any suggestion for future eapis to be |
19 |
accepted only if they come from people able to prepare that |
20 |
implementation in the package manager their prefer and, then, be stalled |
21 |
more and more time :| |
22 |
|
23 |
> The plan is we'll present the EAPI 5 branch to the Council and have |
24 |
> them vote on each individual feature. Then we'll cherry-pick the ones |
25 |
> they approve to master. |
26 |
> |