From: | Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations | ||
Date: | Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:36:20 | ||
Message-Id: | e117dbb90911040436h249ce099s1bd09367b932f1bb@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations by Christian Faulhammer |
1 | What about ppc64? They are MONTHS behind on stabilization, |
2 | even for security bugs (see bug 281821 for example). The Qt team |
3 | feels this is no longer acceptable. We propose that any arch that |
4 | can't keep up will be demoted to experimental status. |
5 | |
6 | -- |
7 | Ben de Groot |
8 | Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc) |
9 | ______________________________________________________ |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations | Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations | Joseph Jezak <josejx@g.o> |