List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Saturday 06 March 2010 17:47:04 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 03/07/2010 12:31 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 05 March 2010 20:22:44 Duncan wrote:
> >> Ed W posted on Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:33:43 +0000 as excerpted:
> >>> I think I have mostly upgraded my machines, but I completely agree - I
> >>> sometimes let some old virtual machines sit unbooted for a year and
> >>> then suddenly want to use them and bring them up to date and
> >>> occasionally this can be a right old pain in the derrier...
> >> Surely, if you've let it go for a year, it's about as easy to reinstall
> >> from a new stage-3 as it is to try to update from where you are?
> > tell that to my headless machines. shout at their butts.
> no real rush, we can postpone it, but 3 years sounds a bit too much imho
> how about news item this year's November, and removal on next January?
i dont think news items are necessary when profiles already have a built in
deprecation and documentation/notification system.
removal in January means they've been in the tree for ... ?
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)