| 1 |
2008-07-26 02:56:24 Mart Raudsepp napisał(a): |
| 2 |
> On L, 2008-07-26 at 03:39 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Fortunately, the majority of ebuilds/packages are honoring LDFLAGS. Of |
| 4 |
> > course it's kinda difficult to always check if a package honors it or |
| 5 |
> > not. But it's a good idea to file a bug for every package that does not |
| 6 |
> > honor it (without a reason). |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I guess as many are using it to pass --hash-style=gnu in addition to |
| 9 |
> other things[1], an easy way to find out which don't honor it out of |
| 10 |
> your installed packages is to scan for ELF files that contain the .hash |
| 11 |
> ELF section in addition to .gnu.hash ELF section. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
The QA check which verifies that LDFLAGS are respected is now in Portage |
| 14 |
trunk and will be released in 2.2_rc4. This check is enabled when LDFLAGS |
| 15 |
contain "--hash-style=gnu" and "${PN}" != *-bin. Other binary packages |
| 16 |
(e.g. net-www/netscape-flash) should set the QA_DT_HASH array/variable. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage?rev=11205&view=rev |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Archives