1 |
On Thursday 02 July 2009 11:02:45 Tobias Scherbaum wrote: |
2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
> > here's an item that should be relatively quick to address: fix the typo |
4 |
> > in GLEP 39 where this line is missing (it's been in the council homepage |
5 |
> > forever): |
6 |
> > Only Gentoo developers may be nominated |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I'd like to add that requirement for proxies as well. Varied |
9 |
> interpretations of common sense seems to make that necessary. |
10 |
|
11 |
i'd keep them as sep topics as the first should go through quickly without |
12 |
discussion. the latter i'm not terribly sold on -- the understanding is that |
13 |
a council member should have the good sense to only pick an appropriate proxy. |
14 |
the definition of "appropriate" is of course up for grabs. ignoring the |
15 |
tools, there is the possibility of bringing non-devs further into the Gentoo |
16 |
fold (assuming the proxy is well versed in the topics at hand and not just |
17 |
"another body") ... |
18 |
|
19 |
then again, looking at the 4 year history, this has never happened, so it's |
20 |
doubtful it will happen. guess the proposal is fine. |
21 |
-mike |