Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o>
To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net>
Cc: "Aurélien Gouny" <aurelien@×××××.org>, kdolkas@××××××××××××.gr, gentoo-dev@g.o, manson@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:07:03
Message-Id: 1040141423.9467.44.camel@inventor
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? by "Thomas T. Veldhouse"
1 On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 07:55, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
2 > OK -- the culprit is NOT Rodney. Rodney is the only person who has made an
3 > entry into the changelog. The real culprit seems to be Daniel Robbins. ;)
4 > I apologize to Rodney for implicating you as the person who has done the
5 > damage to portage.
6
7 I really dislike this whole theme of finding the "culprit," since I
8 don't think it's helpful. If you're interested, you can view the
9 ChangeLogs here:
10
11 http://cvs.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gentoo-src/portage/ChangeLog?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
12
13 I'll do what I can to ensure that this kind of thing doesn't happen
14 again.
15
16 --
17 Daniel Robbins
18 Chief Architect, Gentoo Linux
19 http://www.gentoo.org

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? Henti Smith <bain@×××××××.za>
Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net>