Archives
Archives
| From: | Vincent Launchbury <vincent@×××××××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Documentation licenses and license_groups | ||
| Date: | Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:05:25 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4B48F5CB.80600@doublecreations.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Documentation licenses and license_groups by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 | > Not sure what we should do about this one. The crucial sentence is: |
| 3 | > ,---- |
| 4 | > | Modifications to the text are permitted so long as any conflicts |
| 5 | > | with the standard are clearly marked as such in the text. |
| 6 | > `---- |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > Any opinions? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | It seems fine to me. I think it's somewhat analogous to how a modified |
| 11 | TeX file must have a new name: it's a minor annoyance, but it doesn't |
| 12 | particularly restrict the end result. |