>>>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:00:32 +0100
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
>> >>>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Zac Medico wrote:
>> > If we do go with a variant of GLEP 55, I'd prefer a variant that
>> > uses a constant extension (like .eb) and places the EAPI string
>> > just after the version component of the name. For example:
>> 
>> >    foo-1.0-r1-eapi5.ebuild
>> 
>> This is so ugly... I guess I'll retire the same day when such an
>> abomination gets accepted. ;-)

> I'm sorry, we're down to "it's ugly and someone already said no and
> I'll throw my toys out of the pram if I don't get my way" as the
> arguments against GLEP 55 now?

Note the smiley in my posting. And yes, it _is_ ugly.

>>>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

> The person who wrote it is one of Satan's little minions. Also,
> change is bad.

And you think that this is better?

Ulrich