1 |
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:59:22 +0200 |
2 |
Matti Bickel <mabi@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> On 09/26/2010 03:22 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
> > Isn't the amount of work to get per-package eclasses basically the |
5 |
> > same as the amount of work to get per-(package and category) |
6 |
> > eclasses? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Actually, I don't know. Tell me. I've no clue how much PM |
9 |
> implementation effort this will be, yet. |
10 |
|
11 |
The difficult bits are: |
12 |
|
13 |
* making sure you can do this without things going horribly wrong for |
14 |
older package managers |
15 |
|
16 |
* making sure metadata cache validation is right |
17 |
|
18 |
* checking everything that uses ECLASSDIR |
19 |
|
20 |
So from that, the complexity is in "making eclasses not be in a single |
21 |
place", not in the number of places eclasses can be. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Ciaran McCreesh |