Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o>
Subject: Re: How default route should be set by pppd
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:09:02 +0100
On Saturday 30 September 2006 18:59, Alin Nastac wrote:
> I discovered that ppp-2.4.4 set a default route without a gateway. It is
> totally fine from IP routing point of view (the simple fact that route
> is through the point-to-point link is enough to know the next hop),
> except that openswan's %defaultroute need a default gateway in order to
> work.

So how does that look in the routing table?

If say a DHCP client renewed it's lease and it set a new default route, would 
this have any effect?

> I'm about to apply a patch that would reverse to the old way of setting
> the default route.
> Any objections?

If it's p.masked then none :)

Thanks

-- 
Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o>
Gentoo/Linux Developer (baselayout, networking)
-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: How default route should be set by pppd
-- Alin Nastac
References:
How default route should be set by pppd
-- Alin Nastac
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
How default route should be set by pppd
Next by thread:
Re: How default route should be set by pppd
Previous by date:
Re: RFC about another *DEPEND variable
Next by date:
Re: Last rites: tuxracer/tuxracer-demo


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.