Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Justin <jlec@g.o>
Subject: Re: My wishlist for EAPI 5
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 23:43:36 +0200
On 20.06.2012 22:35, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:25:30 -0400
> Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> wrote:
>> Multilib (and/or multiarch) support
>> 	The current binaries cause a great deal of pain, particularly
>> when a user does not want to upgrade something. I had this problem
>> with WINE and glibc because I wanted to avoid the reverse memcpy()
>> fiasco on my systems. This situation would have been avoided entirely
>> if the package manager supported multilib.
> 
> This one's unlikely to happen unless someone's prepared to put in the
> work.

Tommy worked a lot on this and he asked for help to bring his
proposal/spec/glep into shape.
We are all aware what this is all about and know that anybody who is
using multilib would benefit.
Can't you simply work with him together to get it into what you expect
it to be instead of pointing out that it isn't?

Attachment:
signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
Replies:
Re: My wishlist for EAPI 5
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: My wishlist for EAPI 5
-- Pacho Ramos
References:
My wishlist for EAPI 5
-- Richard Yao
Re: My wishlist for EAPI 5
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: My wishlist for EAPI 5
Next by thread:
Re: My wishlist for EAPI 5
Previous by date:
Re: My wishlist for EAPI 5
Next by date:
Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.