1 |
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 07:13:20PM +0200, Mart Raudsepp wrote: |
2 |
> Hello, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 16:52 +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: |
5 |
> > Hello |
6 |
> > I have managed to split the desktop profile to gnome and kde submenus. The |
7 |
> > result can be found in kde-crazy overlay (not in layman) [1] |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I think this whole approach of adding yet more subprofiles is highly |
10 |
> suboptimal. You are wanting to add at least 28 more subprofiles (the |
11 |
> number would reach the 80s if including hardened/mips, etc), whereas we |
12 |
> just had a sort-of discussion on how we have too many of them already at |
13 |
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_be393426980d12f341cabccfe5ab10aa.xml |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Instead I think we should be improving "eselect profile" to support |
16 |
> multiple inheriting /etc/make.profile files in a user friendly fashion, |
17 |
> and in the end removing 249 subprofiles, instead of adding 28+. |
18 |
Consider me to be a huge fan of this idea. I'm already using it with my |
19 |
managed-portage "system" that I posted some months ago. |
20 |
|
21 |
Beware that some of the non-Portage PMs don't behave quite right with it |
22 |
yet. ferringb was working on fixing pkgcore with I had noted to him with |
23 |
the profiles. I'm not sure about Paludis off the top of my head. |
24 |
|
25 |
We'd be saving at least 655 inodes on disk (in an rsync copy of the |
26 |
tree, add another 1k inodes for a CVS checkout). |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
30 |
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
31 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
32 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |