Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:31:17
Message-Id: 201001141530.34254.hwoarang@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm by Ben de Groot
1 On Wednesday 13 January 2010 23:02:17 Ben de Groot wrote:
2 > 2010/1/13 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>:
3 > > On Tuesday 12 January 2010 15:35:45 Ben de Groot wrote:
4 > >> 2010/1/12 Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>:
5 > >> > If you feel like it, become a proxy-maintainer and poke a developer to
6 > >> > put your ebuilds on tree. Have you ever heard of that ? :)
7 > >>
8 > >> Proxy-maintainership should be given a MUCH higher profile in Gentoo,
9 > >> in my opinion. It is a virtually unknown option.
10 > >
11 > > i think our current work flows also significantly impede the smooth
12 > > running of this. if we had were using a dscm (git) on gentoo-x86, i feel
13 > > like it'd be a much smoother ride for Gentoo devs to pull from a proxy
14 > > maintainer and push on their behalf.
15 > > -mike
16 >
17 > I couldn't agree more!
18 >
19 My experience as developer this years implies that decisions about these
20 things take way too long to get implemented ( or even discussed ). So imho,
21 the best way to promote the proxy-maintainer thing, is individually using our
22 blogs or any other means.
23 --
24 Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
25 Gentoo Linux Developer
26 Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o>