Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: an eclass for github snapshots?
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 11:22:44
Message-Id: 19939.32213.632618.582596@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: an eclass for github snapshots? by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
1 >>>>> On Mon, 30 May 2011, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
2 > Il giorno lun, 30/05/2011 alle 08.27 +0200, Michał Górny ha scritto:
3 >> S="${WORKDIR}/solutious-${PN}-*"
4 >>
5 >> I'm surprised if that actually works. I'd say that seems not
6 >> PMS-compliant but in fact PMS seems to almost not mention S.
7
8 > Because you didn't follow the whole eclass tree ;)
9
10 > ruby-ng handles the star as a special case, given how many of those
11 > we had to use over time, [...]
12
13 But it is not compliant with PMS:
14 "If S is assigned in the global scope of an ebuild, then the
15 restrictions of section 12.2 for global variables apply." (section 12.1)
16 "Global variables must only contain invariant values." (section 12.2)
17
18 Ulrich

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: an eclass for github snapshots? "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: an eclass for github snapshots? Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>