| 1 |
On 06/26/11 14:27, Stuart Longland wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 06/26/11 15:44, Benedikt Böhm wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Stuart Longland <redhatter@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> - revdep-rebuild (handles packages broken by soname changes, etc) |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> solved by preserved-libs in portage-2.2 |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Hmmm, except that portage-2.2 isn't stable yet... indeed it isn't even |
| 9 |
> out of alpha yet. Not going to unleash that on my production systems. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Here's a little secret: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
The only code differences between portage 2.1 and 2.2 appear to be one |
| 14 |
file managing features, so 2.1 just has preserved-rebuild and some of |
| 15 |
the set support disabled. But if you trust 2.1 enough to use it you also |
| 16 |
shouldn't have a problem with 2.2. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
There's still a few silly bugs with preserved-rebuild (corner cases like |
| 19 |
downgrades and stupid build systems), but I've not had any problematic |
| 20 |
behaviour in quite a long time ... |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Patrick Lauer http://service.gentooexperimental.org |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Gentoo Council Member and Evangelist |
| 27 |
Part of Gentoo Benchmarks, Forensics, PostgreSQL, KDE herds |
Archives