Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Paweł Hajdan
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] On the use of bash-completion use flag
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:27:43
Message-Id: 4E043C1B.5060501@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] On the use of bash-completion use flag by "Michał Górny"
1 On 6/24/11 9:07 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
2 > For the additional dependency, I'd put it in some common ebuild (like
3 > bash, or something without compiled binaries -- even better) and I'd
4 > put the flag there.
5 >
6 > There's no reason that a dozen of packages PDEPENDs on bash-completion.
7 > If one decides not to use bash-completion any longer, I don't see a
8 > reason to rebuild all those packages just to get rid of one PDEPEND
9 > (and a single file).
10
11 Seconded. I'm in favor of installing bash completion files
12 unconditionally, and telling the user what to emerge (bash-completion)
13 to use them.
14
15 This is really very very similar to logrotate I think.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature