Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o>
Subject: Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:03:24 +0800
On 15 June 2012 12:45, Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o> wrote:
> On 15 June 2012 09:58, Greg KH <gregkh@g.o> wrote:
>> So, anyone been thinking about this?  I have, and it's not pretty.
>>
>> Minor details like, "do we have a 'company' that can pay Microsoft to
>> sign our bootloader?" is one aspect from the non-technical side that I've
>> been wondering about.
>
> Sounds like something the Gentoo Foundation could do.

I'm certainly not the only one who would be averse to paying Microsoft
any ransom money.

-- 
Cheers,

Ben | yngwin
Gentoo developer
Gentoo Qt project lead


Replies:
Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
-- Greg KH
Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
-- Arun Raghavan
Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
-- Matthew Finkel
References:
UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
-- Greg KH
Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
-- Arun Raghavan
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
Next by thread:
Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
Previous by date:
Re: Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
Next by date:
RFC: new global useflag libass


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.