Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:05:02
Message-Id: CAB9SyzSV_rY4u43gO4hsNynz7KbF5kOT+7k8++BPNrg4b1zVMg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] UEFI secure boot and Gentoo by Arun Raghavan
1 On 15 June 2012 12:45, Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o> wrote:
2 > On 15 June 2012 09:58, Greg KH <gregkh@g.o> wrote:
3 >> So, anyone been thinking about this?  I have, and it's not pretty.
4 >>
5 >> Minor details like, "do we have a 'company' that can pay Microsoft to
6 >> sign our bootloader?" is one aspect from the non-technical side that I've
7 >> been wondering about.
8 >
9 > Sounds like something the Gentoo Foundation could do.
10
11 I'm certainly not the only one who would be averse to paying Microsoft
12 any ransom money.
13
14 --
15 Cheers,
16
17 Ben | yngwin
18 Gentoo developer
19 Gentoo Qt project lead

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] UEFI secure boot and Gentoo Matthew Finkel <matthew.finkel@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] UEFI secure boot and Gentoo Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] UEFI secure boot and Gentoo Greg KH <gregkh@g.o>