Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:43:52 +0100
William Hubbs schrieb:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:07:08PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote:
>> R??mi Cardona wrote:
>>> Le 26/10/2009 22:58, Richard Freeman a ??crit :
>>>> Gentoo is about choice.
>>> No it isn't. Gentoo is about empowering users, giving them the ability 
>>> and tools to _change_ the distro to _their_ needs.
>>>
>>> Gentoo does _not_ cater to all the possible needs.
>>>
>>> This is somewhat off-topic, but it irks me every time I see/hear it, so 
>>> there.
>> Well, I'm not sure I see any contradiction.  When people say that gentoo 
>> is about choice, it means that we should give the end-user flexibility 
>> whenever it is feasible.  Of course that doesn't mean that there should 
>> be a lunar-lander-in-a-box use flag.  However, if KDE 4.2 includes a 
>> lunar lander module we should in fact add such a flag for the benefit of 
>> those of us who don't own space programs.
> 
> Agreed.  However, I think the discussion is around whether we should enable
> the lunar-lander-in-a-box use flag by default and where it should be
> enabled by us if we do enable it.
> 
> Since profiles override IUSE defaults, if we enable the flag in the
> profiles, this means that it will be enabled for all packages that have
> the use flag, regardless of whether they are KDE related, unless the
> user disables the flag in make.conf or package.use.
> 
> On the other hand, if we enable it with IUSE defaults at the
> package level, it lets the user decide whether or not they want it to be
> enabled for their entire system by editing make.conf.

Are you sure about this part? Afaik IUSE defaults overrides make.conf, you will have to explicitly
add an entry to package.use for every package, where it is enabled per IUSE default.


-- 
Thomas Sachau

Gentoo Linux Developer

Attachment:
signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
References:
[RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME
-- Maciej Mrozowski
Re: [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME
-- Rémi Cardona
Re: [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME
-- Maciej Mrozowski
Re: [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME
-- Duncan
Re: Re: [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME
-- Richard Freeman
Re: Re: [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME
-- Rémi Cardona
Re: Re: [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME
-- Richard Freeman
Re: Re: [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME
-- William Hubbs
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME
Next by thread:
Re: Re: [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME
Previous by date:
Re: Re: [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME
Next by date:
Re: Re: [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME


Updated Nov 23, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.