1 |
On Saturday 30 September 2006 15:14, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> It is not a change in policy. It's a codification of existing practice. |
3 |
The behaviour of portage seems to ask you to differ on this. But you also seem |
4 |
to lose your point. |
5 |
|
6 |
I'm discussing the change of behaviour with respect to portage, not the change |
7 |
to devmanual. Why am I not questioning the change to devmanual? Because the |
8 |
bug there is just required by Plasmaroo who act as a proxy between QA and |
9 |
devmanual itself, and thus not up to discuss anymore than a CVS commit. |
10 |
|
11 |
But, the behaviour change for profiles (that currently, for bug or design, |
12 |
acts in a different way than your "existing practice" suggest) is up to |
13 |
debate, as I've found a few reasons not to back up such a change, and rather |
14 |
stick with the current behaviour. |
15 |
|
16 |
So, again, why should we change the behaviour, other than to fullfill your |
17 |
request? |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ |
21 |
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE |