List Archive: gentoo-dev
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:42:49 +0300
Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote:
> Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> > On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
> >> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti:
> >>> I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the
> >>> following flags: "-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common".
> >>>
> >>> -O1 enables some basic optimizations.
> >> At least adding -O1 should not be problematic. I think vapier was
> >> already suggesting this quite a while ago.
> >
> > imo -Wl,-O1 should go into base
> > -mike
>
> So seems like we should just do it (tm).
Why not default/linux?
--
gcc-porting, by design, by neglect
treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
|
| Replies: |
Re: Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"
-- Michael Haubenwallner
|
| References: |
Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"
-- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
|
Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"
-- Petteri Räty
|
Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"
-- Mike Frysinger
|
Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"
-- Petteri Räty
|
| Navigation: |
|
Lists:
gentoo-dev:
< Prev
By Thread
Next >
< Prev
By Date
Next >
|
| Previous by thread: |
| Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common" |
| Next by thread: |
| Re: Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common" |
| Previous by date: |
| Re: Re: Re: Multislot dependencies |
| Next by date: |
| Re: Re: Re: Multislot dependencies |
|