| 1 |
Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 2 |
> One question remains: Is it needed/correct that Portage doesn't take blockers |
| 3 |
> for architecture breakages into account? Such a line/prefix is easily changed |
| 4 |
> and when someone - whatever the bad reason is - uses cvs commit, a real tree |
| 5 |
> breakage is the cause. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
The behaviour is correct. The depstring in question was |
| 8 |
"!<app-text/hunspell-1.0", which means that you can't have <hunspell-1.0 |
| 9 |
and kdelibs installed on a system at the same time. Reason for this |
| 10 |
could e.g. be file collisions that got fixed in hunspell-1.0. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
If the depstring was "!<app-text/hunspell-1.0 app-text/hunspell", (same |
| 13 |
as ">=app-text/hunspell-1.0", just retarded) repoman would complain loudly. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Kind Regards, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Simon Stelling |
| 19 |
Gentoo/AMD64 developer |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives