Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Torsten Veller <ml-en@...>
Subject: Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 12:33:48 +0200
* James Cloos <cloos@...>:
> One change the perl eclasses require is elimination of the code which
> deletes the man pages.
> 
> Deleting the man pages is /extremely/ rude and should not occur.

There was a reason why the man-pages were removed: I think it was
collisions protection and perl people use `perldoc` anyway.

Do we need a patch to avoid collisions? Do you have it ready and tested?


Replies:
Re: Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass
-- James Cloos
Re: Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass
-- Michael Higgins
References:
perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass
-- Torsten Veller
Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass
-- James Cloos
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass
Next by thread:
Re: Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass
Previous by date:
Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
Next by date:
Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.